Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Res. 2017 May 26;157:127–134. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.020

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Dose-response relationship of arsenic with CIMT, presence of plaque and plaque score using restricted cubic splines. Solid lines represent adjusted estimates based on restricted quadratic splines for log transformed arsenic with knots at the 5th, 50th, and 95th percentiles. The green shade areas represent the corresponding 95th confidence intervals. The reference is set at the 10th percentile of arsenic distribution (3.76 μg/g). Adjustment factors are the same as in Tables 2 to 4 (Model 4). Vertical bars represent a histogram of urine arsenic distribution among the study participants. Nine participants in the extreme tail of the distribution are not shown in the histogram.