Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 22;8(27):44893–44909. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16488

Table 1C. The main features of the included studies for the prognostic meta-analysis.

Author Year Country Ethnicity Type Sample N Age Stage Survival results Follow-up(months) HR (95% CI)
Kulda et al 2010 Czech Caucasian CRC tissue 46 62.8 I-IV DFS 45.2 1.88(0.74,4.77)
Shibuya et al 2010 Japan Asian CRC tissue 156 65 I-IV DFS 44 2.81(1.53,5.14)
Nielsen et al 2011 Denmark Caucasian CC tissue 129 70 II DFS ≧60 1.28(1.06,1.55)
Nielsen et al 2011 Denmark Caucasian RC tissue 67 70 II DFS ≧60 0.96(0.81,1.15)
Zhang et al 2013 China Asian CC tissue 138 65 II DFS 66 1.98(0.95,4.15)
Zhang et al 2013 China Asian CC tissue 137 65 II DFS 66 1.88(0.95,3.75)
Zhang et al 2013 China Asian CC tissue 460 65 II DFS 66 1.79(1.22,2.62)
Menendez et al 2013 Spain Caucasian CRC Serum 102 71.6 I-IV DFS 23 0.51(0.25,1.06)
Fukushima et al 2015 Japan Asian CRC tissue 306 65 I-IV DFS 48 2.94(1.68,5.36)
Bullock et al 2015 UK Caucasian CRC tissue 50 72 I-IV DFS 73 2.68(1.21,5.93)
Schetter et al 2008 America Caucasian CC tissue 71 64.4 I-IV OS 80 2.70(1.30,5.50)
Schetter et al 2008 China Asian CC tissue 103 55.8 I-IV OS 84.6 2.40(1.40,4.10)
Kulda et al 2010 Czech Caucasian CRC tissue 46 62.8 I-IV OS 45.2 0.15(0.02,1.33)
Shibuya et al 2010 Japan Asian CRC tissue 156 65 I-IV OS 44 2.69(1.70,4.25)
Nielsen et al 2011 Denmark Caucasian CC tissue 129 70 II OS ≧60 1.17(1.02,1.34)
Nielsen et al 2011 Denmark Caucasian RC tissue 67 70 II OS ≧60 0.97(0.83,1.13)
Faltejskova et al 2012 Czech Caucasian CRC tissue 44 67 I-IV OS 84 1.81(0.56,5.83)
Frifeldt et al 2012 Denmark Caucasian CC tissue 520 71.9 II OS 84 1.08(0.97,1.22)
Zhang et al 2013 China Asian CRC tissue 79 62.9 I-IV OS 65.9 1.92(0.74,4.97)
Menendez et al 2013 Spain Caucasian CRC Serum 102 71.6 I-IV OS 23 0.50(0.25,1.02)
Liu et al 2013 China Asian CRC Serum 166 57.09 I-IV OS 36.4 1.58(0.77-3.21)
Toiyama et al 2013 Japan Asian CRC tissue 153 67.5 I-IV OS 44 0.59(0.21,1.63)
Toiyama et al 2013 Japan Asian CRC Serum 153 67.5 I-IV OS 44 4.12(1.10,15.4)
Chen et al 2013 China Asian CRC tissue 195 66 I-IV OS 60 2.56(1.43,4.57)
Bovell et al 2013 America Caucasian CRC tissue 55 65 IV OS 198 3.25(1.37,7.72)
Oue et al 2014 Japan Asian CC tissue 87 63 II-III OS 54 3.13(1.20,8.17)
Oue et al 2014 Genmany Caucasian CC tissue 145 70 II OS 51.6 2.65(1.06,6.66)
Hansen et al 2014 Denmark Caucasian CC tissue 554 74 II-IV OS 60 1.08(0.89,1.30)
Fukushima et al 2015 Japan Asian CRC tissue 306 65 I-IV OS 48 2.88(1.70,5.08)
Bullock et al 2015 UK Caucasian CRC tissue 50 72 I-IV OS 73 2.47(1.19,5.55)
Kang et al 2015 Korea Asian CC tissue 173 63 II-III OS 80 0.43(0.14,1.27)
Kang et al 2015 Korea Asian RC tissue 104 63 II-III OS 80 2.05(0.56,7.51)

AUC: area under the curve; Se: sensitivity; Sp: specificity; QUADAS: quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. This scoring system comprises seven questions, requiring an answer of “yes,” “no,” or “unclear.”

An answer of “yes” gets a score of 1, while an answer of “no” or “unclear” gets a score of 0; miR panels: miR-18a, miR-20a, miR-21, miR-29a, miR-92a, miR-106b, miR-133a, miR-143, miR-145, miR-342-3p, miR-532-3p, miR-181b; NA: not available; N: number of participants; DFS: disease-free survival; OS: overall survival; HR: hazard ratio; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.