Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 7;12(8):e0181220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181220

Table 1. Methodological quality assessment results.

Author Study purpose Study design Study population Musculoskeletal exposures and/or physiological responses Musculoskeletal symptoms Statistical analyses Results No. of positive categories % of positive categories
Ahn et al (2016) [36] + + ? - ? - + 3/7 42.9%
Albin and
Mcloone (2014) [37]
- + ? ? ? ? - 1/7 14.3%
Billinghurst and Vu (2015) [38] + + + ? NA ? ? 3/6 50.0%
Chiang and Liu (2016) [33] + ? + ? ? ? ? 2/7 28.6%
Chiu et al (2015) [35] + + + ? + + + 6/7 85.7%
Choi et al (2016) [39] ? + + - NA + - 3/6 50.0%
Guan et al (2015) [40] - + + ? NA ? + 3/6 50.0%
Guan et al (2016) [34] + + ? ? NA + ? 3/6 50.0%
Hong et al (2013) [22] ? - + ? NA ? ? 1/6 16.7%
Inal et al (2015) [41] + + + ? ? ? + 4/7 57.1%
Jacquier-Bret et al (2014) [42] ? ? - ? NA + + 2/6 33.3%
Jung et al (2016) [43] - + ? ? NA ? + 2/6 33.3%
Kee et al (2016) [44] + + + ? ? + + 5/7 71.4%
Kietrys et al (2015) [20] + + + ? NA + + 5/6 83.3%
Kim (2015) [45] + - + ? ? + + 4/7 57.1%
Kim and Kim (2015) [25] - + ? - - - + 2/7 28.6%
Kim et al (2012) [46] - ? + ? NA - - 1/6 16.7%
Kim et al (2014) [18] + + + ? ? + + 5/7 71.4%
Kim et al (2014) [47] + + + ? ? + + 5/7 71.4%
Kingston et al (2016) [48] + + + ? NA + + 5/6 83.3%
Ko et al (2016) [49] + + + ? NA + + 5/6 83.3%
Lee and Seo (2014) [50] + + ? ? NA + + 4/6 66.7%
Lee et al (2012) [51] - + + ? ? ? - 2/7 28.6%
Lee et al (2015) [52] + + + ? NA + - 4/6 66.7%
Liang and Hwang (2016) [53] + ? + ? NA + + 4/6 66.7%
Lin et al (2015) [54] + + + ? ? + + 5/7 71.4%
Ning et al (2015) [55] + + ? ? NA ? + 3/6 50.0%
Park et al (2015) [56] + + ? - NA + ? 3/6 50.0%
Pereira et al (2013) [57] + + + ? NA + + 5/6 83.3%
Shan et al (2013) [24] + + + ? ? + + 5/7 71.4%
Shim (2012) [58] ? ? + ? NA + + 3/6 50.0%
Shin and Kim (2014) [59] - ? + ? ? - - 1/7 14.3%
Sommerich et al (2007) [23] ? + ? ? ? ? ? 1/7 14.3%
Stoffregen et al (2014) [60] ? + + ? NA + - 3/6 50.0%
Straker et al (2008) [19] + + + ? NA + + 5/6 83.3%
Trudeau et al (2012) [61] + + ? ? NA + + 4/6 66.7%
Trudeau et al (2013) [62] + + + ? ? + + 5/7 71.4%
Trudeau et al (2016) [63] + + + ? NA + + 5/6 83.3%
Vasavada et al (2015) [64] + + + ? NA + + 5/6 83.3%
Werth and Babski-Reeves (2014) [16] ? + + ? NA ? - 2/6 33.3%
Xie et al (2016) [21] - + + ? ? + + 4/7 57.1%
Xiong and Muraki (2014) [65] + + + ? NA ? ? 3/6 50.0%
Xiong and Muraki (2016) [66] + + ? ? NA + + 4/6 66.7%
Young et al (2012) [67] + + + ? NA + + 5/6 83.3%
Young et al (2013) [68] + ? + ? NA + + 4/6 66.7%

(+): positive, (-): negative, (?): unclear (i.e. insufficient information available), NA: not applicable