Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 29;23:3687–3696. doi: 10.12659/MSM.902155

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies.

Author year Country Patients cohort Number of participants Mean age (years) Male (%) EMB sampling Scanner brand CMR variables analyzed
Mahrholdt 2006 Germany Suspected MC 128 41.2 74.5 LGE region or BV Siemens 1.5T LGE
Yilmaz 2008 Germany Suspected MC 69 58.4 32.9 RV, LV or BV Siemens 1.5T LGE
Gutberlet 2008 Germany Suspected CMC 83 44.8 33.7 IVS GE 1.5T gRE, ER, LGE, LLC
Sramko 2013 Czech Suspected CMC 42 43.9 71.4 RV Siemens 1.5T gRE, ER, LGE, LLC
Lurz 2014-AMC Germany Suspected AMC 70 44.0 87.0 LV Philips 1.5T gRE, ER, LGE, LLC
Lurz 2014-CMC Germany Suspected CMC 62 52.0 69.4 LV Philips 1.5T gRE, ER, LGE, LLC
Bohnen 2015 Germany Suspected MC 31 51.0 77.0 RV or LV Philips 1.5T LGE, LLC
Lurz 2016-AMC Germany Suspected AMC 61 40.0 83.0 BV Philips 1.5T LGE, LLC
Lurz 2016-CMC Germany Suspected CMC 68 46.0 81.0 BV Philips 1.5T LGE, LLC

AMC – acute myocarditis; CMC – chronic myocarditis; MC – myocarditis; EMB – endomyocardial biopsy; CMR – cardiac magnetic resonance; ER – edema ratio; gRE – global relative enhancement; LGE – late gadolinium enhancement.