Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 1;10:3843–3851. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S140062

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in HCC (cohort 2, n=128)

Variables TTR
OS
HR (95% CI) P-value HR (95% CI) P-value
Univariate analysis
 Gender, male vs female 1.59 (0.58–4.37) 0.364 3.08 (0.71–13.8) 0.133
 Age, years, ≥50 vs <50 1.82 (0.80–4.16) 0.155 1.76 (0.69–4.49) 0.238
 HBsAg, positive vs negative 1.41 (0.32–6.19) 0.652 2.42 (0.65–9.02) 0.186
 GGT, U/L, ≥50 vs <50 1.03 (0.50–2.13) 0.935 1.42 (0.69–2.89) 0.342
 AFP, ng/mL, ≥400 vs <400 1.74 (0.87–3.45) 0.116 1.79 (0.77–4.16) 0.176
 Cirrhosis, yes vs no 1.11 (0.48–2.53) 0.812 1.37 (0.55–3.41) 0.500
 Tumor size, cm, ≥5 vs <5 1.55 (0.83–2.90) 0.168 1.95 (0.95–4.03) 0.040
 Tumor number, multiple vs single 1.37 (0.57–3.29) 0.476 1.10 (0.45–2.73) 0.833
 MVI, yes vs no 4.95 (2.23–11.01) 0.000 4.46 (1.69–11.78) 0.003
 Tumor encapsulation, none vs complete 1.12 (0.59–2.16) 0.726 1.14 (0.56–2.35) 0.718
 Tumor differentiation, III-IV vs I–II 1.02 (0.54–1.93) 0.958 1.60 (0.82–3.14) 0.171
 TNM stage, II+III vs I 2.06 (0.91–4.67) 0.085 2.10 (0.88–5.02) 0.095
 Serum miR-125, high vs low 0.51 (0.25–1.05) 0.067 0.61 (0.29–1.26) 0.178
 Exosomal miR-125, high vs low 0.14 (0.06–0.33) 0.000 0.35 (0.16–0.77) 0.009
Multivariate analysis
 Tumor size, cm, ≥5 vs <5 1.97 (1.02–3.81) 0.025
 MVI, yes vs no 3.82 (2.02–7.20) 0.000 4.76 (2.13–10.61) 0.000
 Exosomal miR-125b, high vs low 0.14 (0.07–0.29) 0.000 0.36 (0.18–0.74) 0.005

Notes: Cox proportional hazards regression model. The bold values indicate P-value <0.05.

Abbreviations: AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; GGT, gamma-glutamyl transferase; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; MVI, microvascular invasion; OS, overall survival; TNM, tumor-node-metastasis; TTR, time to recurrence.