Skip to main content
. 2017 May 9;55(4):314–337. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2016-0191

Table 7. Information and communications.

References Location Date Objective Section
122) Finland 1988 Development of a computer application for the OWAS method. 3.1.6
123) Finland 1992 Development of a data collection and analysis system for the OWAS. 3.1.6
124) Sweden 1997 Use of a PC together with a video camera to record data and make evaluations. Ergonomic evaluation by the OWAS. 3.1.6
125) Sweden 2001 Development of the way to use the OWAS automatically. 3.1.6
126) Spain 2007 Use of simulation for the ergonomic analysis and evaluation of postures according to the OWAS. 3.1.6
128) Japan 2008 Use of virtual reality and posture evaluation with the OWAS. 3.1.6
129) Italy 2008 Use of simulation and modelling together with the OWAS method for the ergonomic design of a job. 3.1.6
127) South Korea 2008 Use of the OWAS to analyse postures represented by the digital human model. 3.1.6
130) Italy 2009 Development of a methodology for the ergonomic design of work places of an industry. 3.1.6
131) Japan 2010 Use of virtual reality and posture evaluation with the OWAS. 3.1.6
134) Sweden 2011 Development of a platform for storing data and information on movements, analysed according to the OWAS. 3.1.6
132) Japan 2012 Development of a system that, with the use of virtual reality, enables the evaluation of work postures, using the OWAS for their evaluation. 3.1.6
136) Germany 2012 Ergonomic evaluation with software that uses the OWAS method. 3.1.6
133) China 2014 Ergonomic simulation using the OWAS and BSHA. 3.1.6
137) Spain 2014 Development of software for the OWAS, in which data are acquired by the sensor Kinect I. 3.1.6
35) Turkey 2015 Development of the software I-OWAS. 3.1.6
139) Japan 2016 Use of Kinect sensor to evaluate postures. 3.1.6
140) Portugal 2016 Application of surface electromyography (sEMG) and 3D cameras to evaluate postures. 3.1.6
141) United States 2016 Application of computer vision to evaluate postures. 3.1.6