Core Tier |
|
Pedagogy |
|
|
Seminars on classroom and clinical teaching strategies with active practice (e.g. giving lectures, using the one-minute preceptor, giving feedback)
Sessions on group dynamics with hands-on exercises (e.g. working in teams, managing challenging small groups)
Required teaching in a course in any UCSF health professions education program
|
|
Curriculum Development |
|
Develop instructional modules that address an identified problem, meet the needs of learners, have clearly articulated goals and objectives, use teaching strategies which match those goals and objectives, and can be successfully implemented.
|
Sessions with sample exercises drawn from learner projects or actual curriculum and hands-on practice (e.g. developing a plan for needs assessment or course evaluation, writing objectives, game matching educational strategies to objectives)
Team consultations for actual curricular projects
|
End of course exam
Completed needs assessment, goals/objectives and/or evaluation of actual curricular project
Team consultation project product and presentation with faculty and peer evaluation and feedback
|
Learning Theory |
|
|
Field observations and written reflections of learning activities (e.g. observation of different levels of learners on bedside rounds)
Written reflections of personal learning experiences, critical incidents
Class discussion and debate
|
|
Scholarship |
|
|
Case-based discussion of scholarship/dissemination rules and etiquette
Interactive sessions with skills practice (e.g. submitting IRBs, designing project proposals, writing abstracts, designing posters)
Individual mentored projects
|
Project product that contributes to curriculum or to knowledge
Dissemination of scholarly project (abstract submission and poster/oral presentation) at local symposium and/or regional or national conferences, and/or publication of article
|
|
Advanced Tier (includes Core Tier elements above and additional elements below) |
|
Assessment |
Workshops
Independent study
|
Develop and/or advocate for the use of learner assessment tools that are: grounded in educational measurement theory; designed according to assessment principles; takes into account feasibility and consequences of assessment; and are appropriate for the knowledge, skills, or attitudes being assessed.
|
Interactive workshops (e.g. writing multiple choice questions, developing standardized patient format exam, designing rating scale)
Required independent readings and written assignments
Evaluation of learner assessment tool and current controversies in assessment
Interview of course director regarding assessment tool
Review and reflection on peer assignments
|
Development and peer evaluation of an standardized patient format exam
Development and validity checking of a performance rating scale
Written reports evaluating assessment tools and addressing current controversies in assessment
Final written reflection of lessons learned and plans for future application
|
Leadership |
Seminars
Independent study
|
|
Required independent readings and written assignments
Interview of educational leader
Observation of educational committee
Review and critique of peer assignments
|
Written analytical reflections on readings addressing organizational structure and curricular change
Written reflective reports of interview with educational leader and observation of educational committee
Critique of peer assignments and summary report of learning
|
Research |
|
Review articles related to research and best practices in education, so as to translate educational theory and strategies to health professions education environments.
Critique scholarly work of others
|
|
|