Table 2.
Fixed Effects From the Two-Level Hierarchical Generalized Linear Model Predicting Recall Performance From Item Value, List, and Study Condition in Experiment 1
| Predictor | β |
|---|---|
| Intercept (β00) | −0.52*** |
| Divided attention vs. full attention (β01) | −0.62*** |
| Familiar music vs. full attention (β02) | −0.20† |
| Unfamiliar music vs. full attention (β03) | −0.07 |
| Value (β10) | 0.16*** |
| Divided attention vs. full attention (β11) | 0.01 |
| Familiar music vs. full attention (β12) | 0.02 |
| Unfamiliar music vs. full attention (β13) | −0.02 |
| List (β20) | 0.04† |
| Divided attention vs. full attention (β21) | 0.05† |
| Familiar music vs. full attention (β22) | −0.03 |
| Unfamiliar music vs. full attention (β23) | 0.01 |
| List × Value (β30) | 0.03** |
| Divided attention vs. full attention (β31) | 0.01 |
| Familiar music vs. full attention (β32) | −0.01 |
| Unfamiliar music vs. full attention (β33) | −0.01 |
Note: The logit link function was used to address the binary dependent variable.
†
p < .10. **p < .01. ***p < .001.