Table 5.
Predictor | β |
---|---|
Intercept (β00) | −0.52*** |
Tone monitoring vs. full attention (β01) | −0.72*** |
Paired tones vs. full attention (β02) | −0.67** |
1-back vs. full attention (β03) | −0.98*** |
Value (β10) | 0.21*** |
Tone monitoring vs. full attention (β11) | −0.02 |
Paired tones vs. full attention (β12) | −0.05 |
1-back vs. full attention (β13) | −0.05 |
List (β20) | 0.01 |
Tone monitoring vs. full attention (β21) | −0.01 |
Paired tones vs. full attention (β22) | 0.06 |
1-back vs. full attention (β23) | 0.09** |
List × Value (β30) | 0.03** |
Tone monitoring vs. full attention (β31) | 0.02 |
Paired tones vs. full attention (β32) | 0.03 |
1-back vs. full attention (β33) | 0.0003 |
Note: The logit link function was used to address the binary nature of the recall outcome.
p < .01. ***p < .001.