Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 7;7:7451. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08022-w

Table 4.

Multivariate analysis of the impact of clinic-pathological features on the survival of oral squamous cell carcinoma patients based on pathological stage and subsites (the tongue and the buccal mucosa only).

All (n = 1383) All Stage I & II (n = 582) All Stage III & IV (n = 801) Tongue Stage I & II (n = 188) Tongue Stage III and IV (n = 229) Buccal Stage I & II (n = 235) Buccal Stage III & IV (n = 321)
HR 95% CI HR 95% CI HR 95% CI HR 95% CI HR 95% CI HR 95% CI HR 95% CI
Age >50 years 0.83 0.67–1.03 0.81 0.51–1.29 0.81 0.64–1.04 0.69 0.29–1.63 0.96 0.62–1.47 0.68 0.34–1.34 0.98 0.68–1.43
Tumor grade
MD vs. WD 1.72 0.96–3.11 1.63 0.70–3.84 1.66 0.73–3.77 0.78 0.16–3.82 >1000 0–>10000 3.08 0.72–13.13 2.17 0.52–9.00
PD vs. WD 2.30 1.25–4.25 2.17 0.83–5.67 2.16 0.93–5.01 1.85 0.34–9.97 >1000 0–>10000 4.75 0.98–22.92 3.01 0.71–12.70
PNI 1.36 1.07–1.72 2.36 1.31–4.21 1.24 0.96–1.60 3.81 1.38–10.54 1.29 0.83–2.00 0.76 0.22–2.59 1.10 0.72–1.67
LVI 2.05 1.59–2.63 0.84 0.30–2.36 2.13 1.63–2.80 0.23 0.03–1.90 1.94 1.16–3.26 0.49 0.07–3.64 1.96 1.32–2.91
ECS 1.16 0.89–1.51 1.16 0.89–1.52 1.47 0.93–2.34 1.46 0.97–2.22
Margin <5 mm 1.76 1.37–2.27 1.29 0.66–2.53 1.85 1.41–2.43 4.28 1.18–15.53 1.19 0.68–2.08 1.05 0.36–3.03 1.85 1.20–2.86
Late stage 2.28 1.71–3.03

Abbreviations: RMT, retromolar trigone; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; WD, well differentiated; MD, moderately differentiated; PD, poorly differentiated; PNI, perineural invasion; LVI, lymphovascular invasion; ECS, extra-capsular spread.