Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 7;12(1):71. doi: 10.1007/s11657-017-0363-y

Table 2.

Comparison of VFF reporting in hip fracture patients with VFF detectable on imaging

Number of patients with detectable VFF on imaging (n = 65)
VFF reported at first opportunity (n = 30) VFF not reported at first opportunity (n = 35)
Number of patients with detectable VFF on imaging (n = 65) 30 (46%) 35 (54%)
Age (mean in years; range) 84 (68–100) 83 (62–100)
Gender (% female) 67% 60%
VFF details
 Cumulative fracture score (mean; SD) 4.5 (3.20) 2.9 (2.23)
 No. of fractures (mean; SD) 2.4 (1.65) 1.7 (1.05)
Imaging details (n, %)
 MRI spinea 7 (23%) 3 (9%)
 MRI other 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
 CT chest, abdomen, pelvis 2 (7%) 3 (9%)
 CT chest ± abdomenb 2 (7%) 7 (20%)
 CT abdomen ± pelvis 0 (0%) 3 (9%)
 CT colon 1 (3%) 7 (20%)
 CT other 0 (0%) 8 (23%)
 X-ray spinea 18 (60%) 0 (0%)
 Lateral chest X-ray 0 (0%) 4 (11%)

VFF vertebral fragility fracture, SD standard deviation

aThoracic and/or lumbar spine

bIncluding CT pulmonary angiogram