Skip to main content
. 2017 May 10;118(2):1198–1209. doi: 10.1152/jn.00108.2017

Table 2.

Results of mixed-model ANOVAs performed on CT or GL nerve responses in adult rats, separately for each chemical stimulus

Taste Nerve Chemical Stimulus Source of Variation df F Ratio P Value Significant?
CT Ethanol Maternal diet 1,14 22.5 0.001 Yes
Concentration 3,42 5.3 0.003 Yes
Interaction 3,42 2.1 0.11
Quinine Maternal diet 1,14 12.1 0.004 Yes
Concentration 3,42 9.0 0.001 Yes
Interaction 3,42 0.5 0.57
Sucrose Maternal diet 1,14 1.0 0.33
Concentration 3,42 16.4 0.001 Yes
Interaction 3,42 0.3 0.62
NaCl Maternal diet 1,14 1.8 0.20
Concentration 3,42 48.5 <0.001 Yes
Interaction 3,42 0.4 0.63
GL Ethanol Maternal diet 1,11 0.9 0.37
Concentration 3,33 8.8 0.02 Yes
Interaction 3,33 1.2 0.34
Quinine Maternal diet 1,11 4.3 0.06
Concentration 3,33 8.3 0.005 Yes
Interaction 3,33 4.2 0.04 Yes
Sucrose Maternal diet 1,11 1.7 0.22
Concentration 3,33 14.9 <0.001 Yes
Interaction 3,33 0.3 0.72
NaCl Maternal diet 1,11 <0.1 0.84
Concentration 3,33 32.9 <0.001 Yes
Interaction 3,33 <0.1 0.83

Values are results of mixed-model ANOVAs performed on CT or GL nerve responses in adult rats, separately for each chemical stimulus (data in Figs. 2 and 4). We did not assume sphericity for the repeated measure (i.e., concentration), and we present corrected P values according to the Greenhouse-Geisser procedure; for clarity, we present uncorrected df.