Skip to main content
. 2017 May 10;118(2):1198–1209. doi: 10.1152/jn.00108.2017

Table 4.

Analysis of how age, sex, and concentration alter CT nerve responses in ethanol rats

Chemical Stimulus Source of Variation df F Ratio P Value Significant?
Ethanol Age (A) 1,13 6.1 <0.03 Yes
Sex (S) 1,13 3.5 0.09
Concentration (C) 3,39 0.3 0.66
A × S 1,13 3.7 0.08
A × C 3,39 2.4 0.14
S × C 3,39 1.4 0.26
A × S × C 3,39 1.7 0.21
Quinine Age (A) 1,13 <0.1 0.77
Sex (S) 1,13 2.1 0.17
Concentration (C) 3,39 12.1 <0.001 Yes
A × S 1,13 3.2 0.10
A × C 3,39 2.6 0.10
S × C 3,39 0.3 0.76
A × S × C 3,39 0.1 0.86
Sucrose Age (A) 1,13 6.7 <0.03 Yes
Sex (S) 1,13 0.5 0.49
Concentration (C) 3,39 15.7 <0.001 Yes
A × S 1,13 1.3 0.28
A × C 3,39 2.9 0.11
S × C 3,39 0.7 0.42
A × S × C 3,39 1.8 0.19
NaCl Age (A) 1,13 4.2 0.063
Sex (S) 1,13 1.6 0.23
Concentration (C) 3,39 95.6 <0.001 Yes
A × S 1,13 0.9 0.37
A × C 3,39 2.9 0.06
S × C 3,39 1.9 0.16
A × S × C 3,39 0.6 0.56

Values are results of analysis of how age, sex, and concentration alter CT nerve responses in ethanol rats. We did not assume sphericity for the repeated measure (i.e., concentration), and we present corrected P values according to the Greenhouse-Geisser procedure. For clarity, we present uncorrected df.