Fig. 6.

The change in AICc across target-distractor separations, task, and experiments as a function of saccade latency. The average AICc for the different models across participants for experiment 1 (EXP 1; A and C) and experiment 2 (EXP 2; B and D) as a function of saccade latency for the STT and STM task is shown. While the green line indicates the full model, the yellow and purple lines indicate the ΔAICc of stimulus-capture-only and global-effect-only models relative to the full model, respectively. In experiment 1, the full model almost always fits the data better than either of the alternative simpler models. Indeed, as the panel collapsed across separations shows, when considering all target-distractor separations, the full model was always the best model (with the small square indicating the average ΔAICc collapsed across separations and saccade latency). This pattern is true also for the data of experiment 2. Here the data collapsed across contrast is presented, and, while the plots are substantially smoother due to the increased number of trials, they match very closely with the data found in experiment 1.