Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 3;8(1):39–48. doi: 10.1007/s10433-011-0174-8

Table 1.

Categorisations of the 16 PRMQ items

Item no. Prospective vs. retrospective Short- vs. long-term Self-cued vs. envir. cued Positive vs. negative wording
1 Prospective Short-term Self-cued Positive
2 Retrospective Long-term Envir. cued Positive
3 Prospective Short-term Envir. cued Negative
4 Retrospective Short-term Self-cued Negative
5 Prospective Long-term Self-cued Negative
6 Retrospective Short-term Envir. cued Negative
7 Prospective Long-term Envir. cued Negative
8 Retrospective Long-term Self-cued Negative
9 Retrospective Long-term Envir. cued Negative
10 Prospective Short-term Envir. cued Positive
11 Retrospective Short-term Self-cued Positive
12 Prospective Long-term Envir. cued Positive
13 Retrospective Short-term Envir. cued Positive
14 Prospective Long-term Self-cued Positive
15 Retrospective Long-term Self-cued Positive
16 Prospective Short-term Self-cued Negative

Note: “envir. cued” = environmentally cued. All items were answered on a 5-point Likert type scale ranging from 1 = “agree strongly” to 5 = “disagree strongly”