Table 1.
Categorisations of the 16 PRMQ items
| Item no. | Prospective vs. retrospective | Short- vs. long-term | Self-cued vs. envir. cued | Positive vs. negative wording |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Prospective | Short-term | Self-cued | Positive |
| 2 | Retrospective | Long-term | Envir. cued | Positive |
| 3 | Prospective | Short-term | Envir. cued | Negative |
| 4 | Retrospective | Short-term | Self-cued | Negative |
| 5 | Prospective | Long-term | Self-cued | Negative |
| 6 | Retrospective | Short-term | Envir. cued | Negative |
| 7 | Prospective | Long-term | Envir. cued | Negative |
| 8 | Retrospective | Long-term | Self-cued | Negative |
| 9 | Retrospective | Long-term | Envir. cued | Negative |
| 10 | Prospective | Short-term | Envir. cued | Positive |
| 11 | Retrospective | Short-term | Self-cued | Positive |
| 12 | Prospective | Long-term | Envir. cued | Positive |
| 13 | Retrospective | Short-term | Envir. cued | Positive |
| 14 | Prospective | Long-term | Self-cued | Positive |
| 15 | Retrospective | Long-term | Self-cued | Positive |
| 16 | Prospective | Short-term | Self-cued | Negative |
Note: “envir. cued” = environmentally cued. All items were answered on a 5-point Likert type scale ranging from 1 = “agree strongly” to 5 = “disagree strongly”