Table 4.

The high resistant and susceptible accessions screened out

Accession name	DLP (%)							LW (g)
	Experiment 1			Experiment 2			Zhan [10]	Wu [11]
	DLP1	DLP2	Mean 1	DLP1	DLP2	Mean 2
Resistant
Lamar	12	5	9	12	7	9
PI227687	20	9	15	23	13	18	23	0.209
JAPAN	32	20	26	35	21	28	18	0.258
P64	39	36	38
Bethol	40	30	35
AGH	43	45	44	54	35	44	20	0.240
ZD14	40	50	45				18	0.347
TSBPHDJ	44	46	45				23
HPXQD	40	52	46	50	46	48	16	0.230
NN89-30	50	47	49				21	0.304
Average 1	36	34	35	35	24	29	20	0.265
Susceptible
JNLSD	73	83	78				38	0.650
MYBMD	71	78	75	83	85	84	34	0.733
XJ2	64	83	74
DPDLH	62	77	70	72	79	75	46	0.747
JXQDA	65	74	70				47
XTDD	62	73	68
NN89-29	54	75	65	73	76	74	42	0.659
FJ341	64	63	64				36
JLNMH	54	69	62	64	70	67	49	0.702
CYHZM	61	61	61				42	0.671
Average 2	63	74	69	73	78	75	42	0.693

In “Accessions name” column, accessions in italics are the same with the Zhan’s and Wu’s results [10, 11]. Average 1 and Average 2 are the mean of resistant and susceptible accessions, respectively. “DLP1” and “DLP2” represent the average DLP over dates of Test 1 and Test 2, respectively. Mean 1 and Mean 2 are the mean of Experiment 1 and Experiment 2, respectively