Skip to main content
. 2005 May 21;2(2):76–87. doi: 10.1007/s10433-005-0025-6

Table 3.

Proportions of older people in deprived urban neighbourhoods affected by different forms of social exclusiona

% of respondents in each category excluded from:
Material resources Social relations Civic activities Basic services Neighbourhood
Age n.s. n.s. n.s. *** *
60–74 years 29 41 14 19 11
75 years and above 32 39 15 31 18
Gender n.s. n.s. * n.s. n.s.
Female 31 39 18 22 14
Male 27 43 11 25 13
Marital status *** n.s. ** n.s. n.s.
Never married 27 46 14 17 19
Married 20 39 10 25 15
Widowed 37 39 20 21 13
Divorced/separated 39 46 23 27 5
Ethnic origin *** *** * *** **
White 27 37 18 19 17
Black Caribbean 25 37 7 21 3
Indian 24 29 5 14 5
Pakistani 33 63 11 33 4
Somali 69 77 11 69 11
Age on completing education *** n.s. *** n.s. *
15 years or less 33 41 17 24 15
16 years or more 6 40 4 17 6
Years in neighbourhood n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s.
0–4 41 56 26 26 7
5–19 29 48 14 29 10
20 or more 29 39 15 22 14
Tenure *** n.s. *** n.s. n.s.
Home owner 12 36 8 21 12
Social renter 44 43 20 24 14
Private renter 33 51 22 31 18
Housing conditions *** *** n.s. * *
No housing problems 20 32 16 19 11
One housing problem 28 44 16 23 12
Two or more problems 45 54 12 29 19
Experience of crime * *** n.s. *** ***
No crimes 26 34 16 17 10
One or more crimes 35 50 13 31 19
Self-reported health *** *** * ** ***
Very good or good 22 32 11 18 10
Neither good nor poor 34 45 16 21 12
Very poor or poor 37 50 20 32 19
Health status n.s. n.s. n.s. ** *
No limiting condition 27 38 14 18 11
Limiting condition 32 44 16 28 16
Quality of life *** *** *** *** *
Very good or good 23 30 10 17 11
Neither good nor poor 38 53 21 23 15
Very poor or poor 43 64 23 45 21
All (n=581)
% of sample excluded on this dimension 29 41 15 23 13

aTest on differences based on Chi-square tests: n.s., not significant; *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001