Table 1.
The current methods used to identify risk in CML.
| Previous methods | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study | Factors | Method | Target prediction | Data and results |
| Sokal score, Sokal et al. [78] | Age, spleen size (cm), blast (%), and platelets (109/L) | Multivariate analysis of survival | Risk groups for chemotherapy | Six European and American sources (n = 813), low 39%, intermediate 38%, and high 23% |
|
| ||||
| Hasford score, Hasford et al. [79] | Age, spleen size (cm), blasts (%), eosinophils (%), basophils (%), and platelets (109/L) | Multivariate analysis of survival | Risk groups for interferon alpha alone | 14 studies (n = 981), low 40.6%, intermediate 44.7%, and high 14.6% |
|
| ||||
| EUropean Treatment Outcome Study (EUTOS) Score, Hasford et al. [80] | Basophils (%) and spleen size (cm) | Multivariate analysis of response | CCgR at 18 months to Imatinib | Five national study groups (n = 2,060), low 79% and high 21% |
|
| ||||
| EUTOS Long-Term survival (ELTS) score, Hoffmann et al. [81] | Age, spleen size (cm), blast (%), and platelets (109/L) | Multivariate analysis of response | Long-term survival | (n = 2,205) low 61%, intermediate 27%, and high 12% |