Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 25;2017:3587309. doi: 10.1155/2017/3587309

Table 1.

The current methods used to identify risk in CML.

Previous methods
Study Factors Method Target prediction Data and results
Sokal score, Sokal et al. [78] Age, spleen size (cm), blast (%), and platelets (109/L) Multivariate analysis of survival Risk groups for chemotherapy Six European and American sources (n = 813), low 39%, intermediate 38%, and high 23%

Hasford score, Hasford et al. [79] Age, spleen size (cm), blasts (%), eosinophils (%), basophils (%), and platelets (109/L) Multivariate analysis of survival Risk groups for interferon alpha alone 14 studies (n = 981), low 40.6%, intermediate 44.7%, and high 14.6%

EUropean Treatment Outcome Study (EUTOS) Score, Hasford et al. [80] Basophils (%) and spleen size (cm) Multivariate analysis of response CCgR at 18 months to Imatinib Five national study groups (n = 2,060), low 79% and high 21%

EUTOS Long-Term survival (ELTS) score, Hoffmann et al. [81] Age, spleen size (cm), blast (%), and platelets (109/L) Multivariate analysis of response Long-term survival (n = 2,205) low 61%, intermediate 27%, and high 12%