Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 25;7(3):359–366. doi: 10.3892/mco.2017.1346

Table II.

Effect of LEM vs. placebo on QOL scores during the study course.

First course Second course


Scores Groups Subject no. Day 1 Day 8 Day 22 Day 8 Day 22
FACT-BRM total score LEM 21 119.5±5.1 107.0±4.9 112.9±5.5 103.9±5.7 112.6±4.6
Placebo 21 116.2±4.1 100.5±5.9 110.4±5.6 96.2±5.4a 107.4±5.9
FACT-G total score LEM 21 80.4±3.6 71.6±3.4 75.6±3.8 69.4±4.1 74.7±3.2
Placebo 21 77.4±3.5 66.6±4.2 73.0±4.0 63.2±3.7a 71.1±4.2
FACT-BRM TOI LEM 21 81.4±3.7 69.4±3.9 75.9±4.0 67.7±4.1a 76.0±3.5
Placebo 21 81.6±2.4 65.1±4.3b 74.8±3.8 61.8±3.8b 72.1±4.3
PWB LEM 22 23.9 ±0.8 18.6±1.3b 21.8±1.1 17.6±1.4b 20.5±1.0a
Placebo 21 24.1±0.9 17.0±1.7b 20.7±1.2a 15.7±1.3b 20.0±1.3a
SWB LEM 21 20.8±1.1 20.6±1.3 20.5±1.3 20.1±1.3 19.6±1.3
Placebo 21 19.4±1.6 20.2±1.5 19.0±1.7 19.6±1.5 19.0±1.6
EWB LEM 22 17.3±1.0 17.0±1.1 16.5±1.2 16.1±1.4 16.9±1.1
Placebo 21 15.3±1.1 15.2±1.2 16.6±0.9 14.8±1.1 16.3±1.0
FWB LEM 22 18.5±1.7 15.4±1.5 16.8±1.4 15.6±1.4 17.7±1.4
Placebo 21 18.6±1.4 14.2±1.7a 16.7±1.4 13.1±1.1b 15.8±1.6
BRMP LEM 21 22.5±1.0 20.4±0.7 20.8±0.9 18.7±1.1a 20.8±0.8
Placebo 21 22.1±1.0 19.3±1.0a 21.5±0.8 18.8±1.0a 20.9±1.1
BRMCE LEM 21 16.6±1.1 15.0±1.2 16.5±1.3 15.8±1.0 17.1±1.0
Placebo 21 16.7±1.0 14.6±1.2 15.9±1.2 14.2±1.3 15.4±1.2

Measurement values are shown as mean ± standard error. Variation within each group was assayed by the Kruskal-Wallis test with the Steel test vs. day 1 of the first course.

a

P<0.05

b

P<0.01. LEM, Lentinula edodes mycelia extract; QOL, quality of life; FACT, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy; G, general scale; TOI, Trial Outcome Index; PWB, physical well-being; SWB, social/family well-being; EWB, emotional well-being; FWB, functional well-being; BRMP, BRM physical subscale; BRMCE, BRM cognitive/emotional subscale; BRM, biological response modifier.