Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016 Feb 26;27(4):435–442. doi: 10.1111/jce.12931

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Comparison between simulated and inverse-computed EGMs. A: Relative error between inverse computed electrograms (icEGM) and original electrograms (EGM) with and without the addition of white noise to the surface electrocardiograms (i.e., signal to noise ratio [SNR] of 10 dB). B: Comparison between the original EGMs and icEGMs at a selected atrial site. For a high quality, full color version of this figure, please see Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology’s website: www.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jce