Table 2.
Study | Year | Study Design | No. of Patients | Patient Cohort | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Murray, Colombo [36] | 2014 | Unblinded, non-randomised trial | 109 | Systolic or diastolic heart failure patients with NYHA Class II–IV | Treatment with ranolazine compared to standard heart failure therapy alone resulted in: Increased LVEF (>7 EFU, p < 0.001) Cardiovascular event rate reduction |
Maier et al. [34] | 2013 | Prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled proof-of-concept study | 20 | Patients with diastolic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (EF > 45%) | In comparison to placebo, treatment with ranolazine in heart failure resulted in: Reduced left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (2.2 mmHg, p = 0.04) Reduction in cardiac out (0.3 l/min) and stroke volume (3.3 mL) (p = 0.04) No difference in exercise tolerance No difference in BNP levels |
Morrow et al. [33] | 2010 | Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial | 4543 | Non-ST-segment elevation ACS patients | Treatment with ranolazine compared to placebo resulted in: 13% reduction in the rate of recurrent ischemia (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.76–0.99; p = 0.03) No difference in incidence of new or worsening heart failure No difference in exercise performance No change in BNP concentration |
NYHA = Ney York Heart Association; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; EFU = ejection fraction units; BNP = brain natriuretic peptide; ACS = acute coronary syndrome.