Skip to main content
. 2017 May 10;5(2):14. doi: 10.3390/diseases5020014

Table 2.

Summary of clinical trials investigating the potential use of ranolazine in heart failure.

Study Year Study Design No. of Patients Patient Cohort Results
Murray, Colombo [36] 2014 Unblinded, non-randomised trial 109 Systolic or diastolic heart failure patients with NYHA Class II–IV Treatment with ranolazine compared to standard heart failure therapy alone resulted in:
Increased LVEF (>7 EFU, p < 0.001)
Cardiovascular event rate reduction
Maier et al. [34] 2013 Prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled proof-of-concept study 20 Patients with diastolic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (EF > 45%) In comparison to placebo, treatment with ranolazine in heart failure resulted in:
Reduced left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (2.2 mmHg, p = 0.04)
Reduction in cardiac out (0.3 l/min) and stroke volume (3.3 mL) (p = 0.04)
No difference in exercise tolerance
No difference in BNP levels
Morrow et al. [33] 2010 Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial 4543 Non-ST-segment elevation ACS patients Treatment with ranolazine compared to placebo resulted in:
13% reduction in the rate of recurrent ischemia (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.76–0.99; p = 0.03)
No difference in incidence of new or worsening heart failure
No difference in exercise performance
No change in BNP concentration

NYHA = Ney York Heart Association; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; EFU = ejection fraction units; BNP = brain natriuretic peptide; ACS = acute coronary syndrome.