Table 3.
Study | Year | Study Design | Results |
---|---|---|---|
Sossalla et al. [39] | 2008 | Treatment of myocytes of 10 isolated failing human hearts with ranolazine | Treatment with ranolazine resulted in a reduction of the diastolic tension (3.9 mN/mm2 reduction, p < 0.05) |
Rastogi et al. [42] | 2008 | Canine study of 28 dogs with induced heart failure with a randomised, blinded, placebo-controlled design | Treatment with ranolazine alone in heart failure resulted compared to placebo in: Improved EF by 2% (p ≤ 0.05) Reduction of EDWS by 14 gm/cm2 Treatment with combination of ranolazine and enalapril compared to placebo resulted in: Improved EF by 5% (p ≤ 0.05) Reduction of EDWS by 13 gm/cm2 Treatment with combination of ranolazine and metoprolol compared to placebo resulted in: Improved EF by 7% (p ≤ 0.05) Reduction of EDWS by 20 gm/cm2 |
Undrovinas et al. [40] | 2006 | Treatment of 26 isolated canine hearts post induction of heart failure | Ranolazine treatment of isolated canine hearts with induced heart failure resulted in: Restoration of normal myocyte relaxation Reduction in the resting tension of the myocytes |
Sabbah et al. [41] | 2002 | Canine study of 21 dogs with induced heart failure | Treatment of dogs with heart failure with ranolazine resulted in: Reduction of LVEDP by 3 mmHg (p = 0.001) Increased cardiac output of 0.39 L/min (p = 0.01) |
EF = ejection fraction; EDWS = end-diastolic circumferential wall stress; LVEDP = left ventricular end-diastolic pressure.