Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 14;60(4):810–825. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-16-0107

Table 7.

Mean (SD) percentage of maximum isometric lingual–alveolar contact pressure (LACP-Max) utilized during speech (%Max), with statistical results including omnibus testing (Kruskal–Wallis) and effect size (Cohen’s d). No post hoc comparisons were completed because all omnibus tests were nonsignificant.

Phoneme Control Bulbar Spinal Kruskal–Wallis results
Effect size estimate (Cohen’s d)
χ2 df α Control vs. bulbar Control vs. spinal Bulbar vs. spinal
/t/ M 5.99 5.35 8.38 5.274 2 .072 −0.2 1.0 1.3
(SD) (4.45) (3.02) (2.41)
/d/ M 5.71 5.96 7.33 2.981 2 .225 0.1 0.7 0.6
(SD) (5.52) (3.14) (2.33)
/s/ M 5.07 4.90 4.00 1.549 2 .461 −0.1 −0.3 −0.2
(SD) (3.47) (2.85) (4.26)
/z/ M 4.14 2.32 5.64 5.674 2 .059 −2.0 0.3 0.7
(SD) (2.30) (0.90) (4.89)
/l/ M 3.73 5.77 5.03 1.868 2 .393 0.6 0.3 −0.2
(SD) (4.00) (3.59) (3.75)
/n/ M 5.35 5.45 5.71 .871 2 .647 0.0 0.2 0.1
(SD) (4.91) (2.87) (2.28)