Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 8.
Published in final edited form as: N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 8;376(23):2211–2222. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613210

Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics of the Patients in the Per-Protocol Analysis.*

Characteristic Dissection (N = 824) Observation (N = 931)
Sex — no. (%)
 Female 346 (42.0) 382 (41.0)
 Male 478 (58.0) 549 (59.0)
Age — yr
 Mean 52.5±12.9 53.2±13.6
 Median (range) 53.7 (18–76) 54.9 (19–76)
Smoking status — no./total no. (%)
 Never 463/803 (57.7) 522/907 (57.6)
 Former 193/803 (24.0) 227/907 (25.0)
 Current 147/803 (18.3) 158/907 (17.4)
Breslow thickness
 Mean — mm 2.76±2.34 2.70±2.11
 Median (range) — mm 2.10 (0.34–28.0) 2.10 (0.35–30.0)
 <1.50 mm — no. (%) 237 (28.8) 257 (27.6)
 1.50–3.50 mm — no. (%) 404 (49.0) 462 (49.6)
 >3.50 mm — no. (%) 183 (22.2) 212 (22.8)
Primary site — no. (%)
 Arm or leg 327 (39.7) 382 (41.0)
 Head or neck 113 (13.7) 128 (13.7)
 Trunk 384 (46.6) 421 (45.2)
Ulceration — no. (%)
 Absent 508 (61.7) 578 (62.1)
 Present 316 (38.3) 353 (37.9)
No. of positive sentinel lymph nodes — no. of patients (%)
 0, RT-PCR–positive 80 (9.7) 111 (11.9)
 1 596 (72.3) 643 (69.1)
 2 121 (14.7) 162 (17.4)
 3 18 (2.2) 10 (1.1)
 >3 9 (1.1) 5 (0.5)
Diameter of sentinel-lymph-node metastasis — mm
 Mean 1.07 1.11
 Median 0.61 0.67
 Interquartile range 0.27–1.32 0.23–1.38
Size of sentinel-lymph-node metastasis — no. of patients/total no. (%)
 <0.1 mm 45/566 (8.0) 65/623 (10.4)
 0.1–1.0 mm 333/566 (58.8) 343/623 (55.1)
 >1.0 mm 188/566 (33.2) 215/623 (34.5)
Received adjuvant therapy — no./total no. (%)§ 66/814 (8.1) 60/922 (6.5)
*

Plus–minus values are means ±SD. There were no significant between-group differences in the characteristics listed here. Percentages may not total 100 because of rounding. RT-PCR denotes reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction.

Data were missing for 21 patients in the dissection group and 24 patients in the observation group.

The sentinel-node metastasis burden, the longest diameter of the largest tumor deposit, was not available for 178 patients in the dissection group and 197 patients in the observation group.

§

Data were not available for 10 patients in the dissection group and 9 patients in the observation group.