Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Invest Dermatol. 2017 May 10;137(8):1749–1756. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2017.04.023

Table 2. Associations between tagging SNPs in WNT2B and BTRC of the Wnt pathway and CMSS of CM patients in the MDACC Study and the Harvard study.

Genotype MDACC study Harvard study


All Death (%) HR (95% CI)1 P1 All Death (%) HR (95% CI)2 P2
WNT2B
rs1175649
 GG 682 68 (10.0) 1.0 0 321 32 (10.0) 1.0 0
 GT 171 27 (15.8) 2.11 (1.32-3.38) 0.002 85 14 (16.5) 1.76 (0.94-3.29) 0.079
 TT 5 0 (0.0) -- -- 3 2 (66.7) 7.02 (1.62-30.30) 0.009
 Trend test 1.97 (1.26-3.09) 0.003 2.03 (1.19-3.46) 0.010
 GT+TT vs GG 2.08 (1.30-3.33) 0.002 1.93 (1.06-3.53) 0.031
BTRC
rs61873997
 GG 367 52 (14.2) 1.0 0 171 29 (17.0) 1.0 0
 GA 391 37 (9.5) 0.60 (0.39-0.93) 0.022 182 14 (7.7) 0.44 (0.23-0.83) 0.011
 AA 100 6 (6.0) 0.45 (0.19-1.07) 0.070 56 5 (8.9) 0.50 (0.19-1.29) 0.152
 Trend test 0.62 (0.44-0.87) 0.006 0.58 (0.37-0.92) 0.021
 GA+AA vs GG 0.57 (0.38-0.87) 0.009 0.45 (0.25-0.81) 0.007

Abbreviations: SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; CMSS, cutaneous melanoma-specific survival; CM, cutaneous melanoma; MDACC, MD Anderson Cancer Center; HR: hazards ratio; CI: confidence interval.

1

Adjusted for age, sex, Breslow thickness, regional/distant metastasis, ulceration of tumor and tumor cell mitotic rate.

2

Adjusted for age and sex.