Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 30;26(9):2265–2285. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1564-y

Table 3.

Summary of the quality of the data and studies contributing to the quantitative studies included in this systematic review

Study design Participants and recruitment Comparison group Number of participants Instruments Total
Behan et al. [10], International 0 2 0 3 0 5
Carotenuto et al. [24], Italy 0 0 3 1 2 6
Madsen et al. [25], Denmark 1 2 3 1 0 7
Maglione et al. [23], Italy 3 0 0 1 0 4
McManus et al. [20], UKa 0 1 0 2 2 5
McManus et al. [11], UKa 0 1 2 2 2 7
Mirra et al. [22] 1 0 0 1 2 4
Pifferi et al. [21], Italy 1 1 2 2 2 8
Taelman et al. [27], Belgiumb 0 0 0 1 0 1
Taelman et al. [26], Belgiumb 0 1 0 1 0 2

Scoring was according to Criteria for Rating Methodological Quality of Quantitative Studies adapted from previous studies [1315]

aSame UK sample n

bSame Belgian sample