Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 14;6(8):1893–1903. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1129

Table 2.

miRNA expression of esophageal cancer samples in published articles and the TCGA

miRNA Stem‐loop miRNA expression in article miRNA expression in TCGA
Tumor versus noncancerous P‐value log2 (fold change) P‐value
hsa‐miR‐100‐5p hsa‐mir‐100 Downregulated 0.00002 −1.695 0.04018
hsa‐miR‐133b hsa‐mir‐133b Downregulated 0.02949 −2.097 0.00451
hsa‐miR‐155‐5p hsa‐mir‐155 Upregulated 0.00580 0.906 0.00136
hsa‐miR‐21‐5p hsa‐mir‐21 Upregulated 0.00020 1.138 0.00008
hsa‐miR‐223‐3p hsa‐mir‐223 Upregulated 0.00516 0.949 0.00197
hsa‐miR‐424‐5p hsa‐mir‐424 Upregulated 0.02595 −0.10022 0.09163
hsa‐miR‐375 hsa‐mir‐375 Downregulated 0.00027 −1.82663 0.13509
hsa‐miR‐205‐5p hsa‐mir‐205 Downregulated 0.00131 1.47158 0.41074
hsa‐miR‐143‐3p hsa‐mir‐143 Downregulated 0.00280 −1.72661 0.10537
hsa‐miR‐203a‐3p hsa‐mir‐203a Downregulated 0.00699 −1.09907 0.60401
hsa‐miR‐192‐5p hsa‐mir‐192 Downregulated 0.01563 0.27979 0.20536
hsa‐miR‐27b‐3p hsa‐mir‐27b Downregulated 0.02094 −0.79117 0.15092
hsa‐miR‐194‐5p hsa‐mir‐194‐1 Downregulated 0.03672 0.07901 0.29485
hsa‐let‐7c hsa‐let‐7c Downregulated 0.04733 −1.24124 0.13345

miRNA expression in this article is tested with the novel RRA method. miRNA expression in TCGA is tested with paired t‐test (two‐sided). The miRNA with bold text is coincident and significant between published article data and TCGA data.