Skip to main content
. 2014 May 3;12(1):51–60. doi: 10.1007/s10433-014-0315-y

Table 2.

Regressing indicators of well-being on caregiver status and interaction terms with controls for sociodemographic background variables

Life satisfaction Happiness Positive affect Negative affect Depression Loneliness
Full-time employmentª 0.22 (0.13)** 0.20 (0.10)** 0.13 (0.08)** −0.13 (−0.08)** −0.16 (−0.09)** −0.22 (−0.12)**
Caregiver statusb
In-hh caregiver −0.06 (−0.02) −0.07 (−0.02) 0.11 (0.03) 0.01 (0.00) 0.01 (0.00) 0.07 (0.02)
Out-of-hh caregiver 0.01 (0.00) 0.13 (0.03) 0.04 (0.01) 0.01 (0.00) 0.01 (0.00) −0.06 (−0.02)
No significant interaction terms between caregiver status and employment status
ΔR2c 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03
R2 0.10 0.05 0.06 0.04 0.07 0.07

Age 25–64. Unstandardized (β) regression coefficients. Men (n = 5,392). All dependent variables range from 1–5, except happiness and depression (1–4)

p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01

Reference categories are aNot in paid work, part-time work

bNon-caregiver. Control for age, education, partner, children, and health. Presented main effects of caregiver status and employment status are calculated before including interaction terms in the model

cVariance explained by employment, caregiving, and interaction terms beyond the effect of controls