Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 1;1(1):279–290. doi: 10.1089/trgh.2016.0027

Table 1.

Socioeconomic Position Between Transgender and Young Men Who Have Sex with Men Participants

        95% CI  
  YMSM (N=123) Trans (N=26) OR Lower Upper p
High school completion, N (%) 111 (90.2) 18 (69.2) 0.42 0.09 0.68 0.01
Currently in school, N (%) 54 (43.9) 5 (20.0) 0.32 0.11 0.91 0.03
Below federal poverty, N (%) 74 (62.7) 19 (73.1) 1.61 0.63 4.15 0.32
Currently employed, N (%) 68 (55.3) 9 (34.6) 0.43 0.18 1.04 0.06
 Has employment benefits, N (%) 35 (51.5) 3 (33.3) 0.47 0.11 2.04 0.47
Workplace discrimination, N (%)
 Denied job 15 (12.2) 3 (16.7) 0.94 0.25 3.51 0.93
 Denied promotion 3 (2.4) 2 (7.7) 3.33 0.53 21.03 0.20
 Unfair evaluation 6 (4.9) 4 (15.4) 3.55 0.92 13.60 0.07
Residential instability, M (SD) 0.28 (0.63) 0.62 (0.90) 1.74 1.03 2.93 0.04
Transactional sex, M (SD)
 Regular partner 0.76 (1.06) 1.18 (1.02) 1.43 0.98 2.08 0.07
 Casual partner 0.56 (1.00) 1.23 (1.24) 1.67 1.16 2.39 0.005

CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; YMSM, young men who have sex with men.