Table 3.
Namur (Belgium) | Tampere (Finland) | Hannover (Germany) | Latina (Italy) | Amersfoort (Netherlands) | Coimbra (Portugal) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
% | PR | 95%CI | % | PR | 95%CI | % | PR | 95%CI | % | PR | 95%CI | % | PR | 95%CI | % | PR | 95%CI | |
Parental education level | ||||||||||||||||||
Low level | 6.6 | 1 | no observations | 2.8 | 1 | 7.4 | 1 | 5.9 | 1 | 4.1 | 1 | |||||||
Middle level | 6.5 | 0.87 | (0.71–1.07) | 1.8 | 1 | 5.4 | 2.11 | (0.40–11.15) | 5.1 | 0.83 | (0.61–1.13) | 4.2 | 0.74 | (0.32–1.71) | 3.4 | 0.83 | (0.52–1.32) | |
High level | 7.7 | 1.26 | (0.71–2.25) | 0.6 | 0.70 | (0.21–2.36) | 3.1 | 1.47 | (0.33–6.59) | 4.3 | 0.85 | (0.53–1.35) | 2.9 | 0.63 | (0.26–1.54) | 2.0 | 0.51 | (0.17–1.50) |
Family Affluence Scale (FAS) | ||||||||||||||||||
0–4 | 6.3 | 1 | 1.3 | 1 | 4.6 | 1 | 6.3 | 1 | 3.5 | 1 | 2.7 | 1 | ||||||
5–7 | 8.3 | 1.18 | (0.92–1.52) | 1.1 | 0.95 | (0.27–3.37) | 3.0 | 0.75 | (0.44–1.25) | 4.7 | 0.69 | (0.54–0.88) | 3.7 | 1.20 | (0.77–1.86) | 3.2 | 1.31 | (0.77–2.22) |
Academic achievement | ||||||||||||||||||
Low (<60%) | 9.2 | 1 | 4.2 | 1 | 3.3 | 1 | 14.2 | 1 | 4.3 | 1 | 6.5 | 1 | ||||||
Average (60–69%) | 7.9 | 0.92 | (0.44–1.91) | 0.3 | 0.06 | (0.01–0.54) | 4.9 | 1.62 | (0.67–3.94) | 7.9 | 0.72 | (0.39–1.30) | 4.1 | 1.02 | (0.66–1.56) | 2.4 | 0.47 | (0.17–1.26) |
Good (>70%) | 5.2 | 0.68 | (0.45–1.02) | no observations | 2.9 | 1.55 | (0.66–3.66) | 2.6 | 0.30 | (0.11–0.78) | 2.8 | 0.93 | (0.61–1.40) | 1.8 | 0.49 | (0.18–1.35) | ||
Student weekly income | ||||||||||||||||||
0–5 € | 4.1 | 1 | no observations | 1.3 | 1 | 3.3 | 1 | 2.3 | 1 | 2.1 | 1 | |||||||
6–20 € | 5.4 | 1.29 | (0.90–1.85) | 0.9 | 1 | 1.9 | 1.34 | (0.30–6.04) | 5.4 | 1.51 | (0.92–2.50) | 1.2 | 0.43 | (0.13–1.48) | 2.7 | 1.31 | (0.43–3.96) | |
> 20 € | 12.1 | 2.51 | (1.49–4.24) | 2.2 | 1.94 | (0.94–4.01) | 6.4 | 3.23 | (1.00–10.49) | 10.5 | 2.50 | (1.28–4.87) | 6.2 | 1.35 | (0.63–2.90) | 6.9 | 2.89 | (1.29–6.47) |
Each model included weekly binge drinking, all SEP indicators and was adjusted by age, gender and migrant background in level 1 and school in level 2
% prevalence; PR prevalence ratio; 95%CI 95% confidence interval