Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Acad Audiol. 2013 Oct;24(9):769–781. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.24.9.2

Table 2.

Results Obtained for FrEquation 1 (Higher) and 2 (Lower) Relative Frequencies, Stimulus Levels, and ABR Metrics Obtained at Each Treatment Interval for Participants with or without ASHA-Criterion Hearing Shift

No ASHA Significant Hearing Change
ASHA Significant Change
Measurement Failure Rate (%)
Freq (kHz) Stimulus Level (dB peSPL) Metric N (%) Mean [lat (msec)or amp (nV)] N (%) Mean [lat (msec) or amp (nV)]
1 95 Change in Latency (CLat1/95) 9 −0.05 12 0.12 52
Change in Amplitude (CAmp1/95) 9 25.86 12 −13.61 52
Loss of Response (LoR1/95) 12 0.25 18 0.33 20
105 Change in Latency (CLat1/105) 27 −0.26 23 −0.05 18
Change in Amplitude (CAmp1/105) 27 1.40 23 8.43 18
Loss of Response (LoR1/105) 29 0.07 25 0.08 14
2 95 Change in Latency (CLat2/95) 18 0.12 20 0.29 32
Change in Amplitude (CAmp2/95) 18 20.01 20 20.64 32
Loss of Response (LoR2/95) 24 0.25 23 0.13 19
105 Change in Latency (CLat2/105) 13 0.06 24 −0.01 26
Change in Amplitude (Camp2/105) 13 10.01 24 57.55 26
Loss of Response (LoR2/105) 17 0.24 24 0.00 22
Latency Increase ≥ 0.3 msec (Lat Inc) 31 0.03 26 0.27 11
Any Loss of Response (Any Loss) 33 0.33 26 0.27 10

Note: ABR measurement failure rates are also noted (stimulus level in dB peSPL; latency in milliseconds, and amplitude in nanovolts).