Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 27;13(7):e1005679. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005679

Table 2. Covariances and correlations of the fitted parameters.

gmax, hr−1 K, μg/L al, 106 CFU/μg glucose lag, hr m, hr−1 ac, hr D, 106 μm2/hr μ, CFUs/μm3
0.029 0.19 0.0018 0.0041 0.0047 6.0 × 104 0.018 5.1 × 104
0.99 3.4 0.022 0.047 0.23 0.11 -0.018 0.0056
0.022 0.015 0.0049 -0.0021 0.061 0.0023 -0.0012 1.0 × 104
0.26 0.19 0.046 0.041 -0.018 0.0035 -0.021 -2.8 × 104
0.12 0.082 0.81 0.50 1.8 0.070 -0.089 9.1 × 104
0.021 0.014 0.23 0.14 0.28 0.018 -0.012 4.5 × 104
0.25 0.26 -0.046 -0.33 0.041 -0.27 0.12 0.0033
0.19 0.18 0.11 -0.12 0.24 0.27 0.77 1.5 × 104

The upper right quadrant shows in Roman font the covariance of the fitted parameters established by bootstrapping (see Materials and methods). The diagonal are the parameter variances. The lower left quadrant shows the correlation coefficients in Italic. Units for the parameters are the same as in Table 1. While we report these values, we emphasize that these values must be interpreted with care since posterior distributions of the parameters are sloppy [49] and do not look like multivariate normal distributions. Instead they show long nonlinear ridges of parameters with nearly-equivalent likelihoods.