(A) Ventral root recordings (Right L2, and Left L2 and L5) showing the effect of green light on the locomotor-like rhythm evoked by 5 μM NMDA and 10 μM 5-HT in the presence of 10 μM NBQX. The superimposed light purple traces are the slow potentials obtained by low pass filtering the raw signal. The green bar indicates the duration of the light. (B) Bar plot showing the average locomotor-like frequency in WT (n = 6) and ChAT-Arch (n = 7) cords under control conditions (no light) in the absence or presence of NBQX. For both WT and ChAT-Arch animals the frequency of the rhythm is significantly slower in the presence of NBQX. ANOVA, p<0.0001 (C–E) Bar plots showing the average change in the absolute phase (C) and frequency (D) of the bilateral flexors for the 10 s just before and just after the light is turned on (Start Light, circles) and the 10 s just before and just after the light is turned off (After Light, squares). (E) Bar plot showing the averaged integrated neurogram (Change in MN firing) of the ipsilateral flexor root for the 10 s just before and just after the light is turned on for WT (black, dark purple), ChAT-Arch (green, light purple) cords in the absence or presence of NBQX. Using a two-way ANOVA, we calculated the statistical differences between the different groups of animals (genetic identity, shown above the bars) and the differences between light on and light off (light status; shown below the bars). (B–C–D–E) Comparison between WT (black, dark purple), ChAT-Arch (green, light purple) cords in the absence or presence of NBQX. The results of the ANOVA for the changes in the phase were (Light status: F (3,88) p=0.2436, genetic identity/Drug treatment: F(3,88) p<0.0001, interaction F(9,88) p=0.3893), for the frequency were (Light status: F (3,88) p=0.0630, Genetic identity/Drug treatment: F(3,88) p=0.1335, interaction F(9,88) p<0.0001) and for the motoneuron firing were (Light status: F (3,88) p<0.0001, Genetic identity/Drug treatment: F(3,88) p=0.0001, interaction F(9,88) p<0.0001). *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.26622.037
Figure 9—source data 1. Source data for Bar plots in Figure 9B.
Figure 9—source data 2. Source data for Bar plots in Figure 9C.
Figure 9—source data 3. Source data for Bar plots in Figure 9D.
Figure 9—source data 4. Source data for Bar plots in Figure 9E.