Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Bone Miner Res. 2017 Jun 13;32(8):1703–1715. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3165

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(A–E) Comparisons between treatment groups at the end of Phase 2 treatment (week 16) in static bone histomorphometry parameters of the proximal tibia and serum TRAP level. * indicates a significant difference between treatment groups. (F) Bone resorption rate (hashed bar) and formation rate (solid bar) of the proximal tibia estimated by 3D in vivo dynamic bone histomorphometry. * indicates a significant difference between resorption and formation. (G–I) Linear correlations between 2D static histomorphometry/serum analysis parameters and 3D in vivo bone dynamic parameters.