Table 4.
Comparison of organisational and environmental factors between units with high and low levels of PCC
| Low PCC | High PCC | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M (sd) | N (%) | M (sd) | N (%) | p-value | Effect size | |
| Unit size (number of residents) | 14.8 (9.3) | 13.7 (9.7) | 0.05 | 0.003a | ||
| Interdisciplinary collaboration | 69.0 (28.5) | 79.7 (23.6) | < 0.001 | 0.041a | ||
| Leadership | 60.2 (27.3) | 77.1 (21.6) | < 0.001 | 0.107a | ||
| Dementia friendly physical environment | 50.2 (29.8) | 63.1 (29.9) | < 0.001 | 0.045a | ||
| Time to spend being with residents | 53.6 (27.5) | 71.8 (24.7) | < 0.001 | 0.108a | ||
| Shared philosophy of care | 70.0 (24.8) | 83.7 (18.3) | < 0.001 | 0.090a | ||
| Social support | 19.2 (3.0) | 20.7 (2.6) | < 0.001 | 0.069a | ||
| Regular supervision | 102 (17.4) | 139 (24.3) | 0.005 | −0.09b | ||
aEta squared,b Phi coefficient