Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 8;8:1350. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01350

Table 2.

Effects of LT and AT on morphological traits of the panicles in four cultivars.

Trait Treatments Yongyou9 Yongyou17 Yongyou538 Zhejing88 ANOVA
G T G ×T
Elongation of panicle exsertion (cm⋅d-1) LT 3.39 ± 0.18b 2.65 ± 0.22b 1.60 ± 0.04b 1.72 ± 0.12b ∗∗ ∗∗ ∗∗
AT 5.61 ± 0.28a 5.04 ± 0.30a 3.70 ± 0.17a 3.11 ± 0.15a
Wrap-around panicle Length (cm) LT 1.13 ± 0.32a 3.79 ± 0.26a 2.69 ± 0.36a 1.47 ± 0.59a ns ns ns
AT 1.99 ± 0.44a 1.77 ± 0.33b 3.10 ± 0.36a 1.90 ± 0.25a
Peduncle length (cm) LT 16.58 ± 0.97a 9.95 ± 0.94b 7.67 ± 0.38b 8.11 ± 0.57b ns ns
AT 17.39 ± 0.93a 18.38 ± 1.01a 18.49 ± 0.83a 15.30 ± 0.63a
Panicle exsertion (%) LT 68.59 ± 3.97b 43.41 ± 3.69b 35.37 ± 2.36b 51.98 ± 2.21b ns ∗∗ ns
AT 89.47 ± 1.83a 95.65 ± 2.64a 87.54 ± 1.82a 85.16 ± 2.89a

Data indicate the means ± standard errors, n = 60. Means within a column followed by a different lowercase letter differ significantly at a level of 0.05. G: genotypes; T: treatments. P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ns, not significant.