Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr-Jun;8(2):200–204. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_1192_16

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Preoperative (a) and postoperative (b) ultrasonographic evaluation of buccal mucosa of Case 2 showed submucosal thickness reduced from 0.8 to 0.6 mm and echogenicity also changes from hyper to hypo