Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr-Jun;8(2):200–204. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_1192_16

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Preoperative (a) and postoperative (b) ultrasonographic evaluation of buccal mucosa of Case 3 showed submucosal thickness reduced from 0.6 to 0.4 mm and echogenicity also changes from hyper to hypo