Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 Jul 4;137(8):1121–1128. doi: 10.1007/s00402-017-2740-9

Table 1.

Average ± standard deviation for gap width measures for the US, mFluoro-Medial and mFluoro-Distal measures in the unloaded and maximally loaded conditions, as well as the average change with load.

Location Method Unloaded Max. Loaded Change
Current Study US Medial Ultrasound 8.7 ± 2.4 mm 10.7 ± 2.2 mm 2.1 ± 0.7 mm
mFluoro-Medial Medial Mimicked Fluoroscopy 9.0 ± 2.5 mm 12.4 ± 2.5 mm 3.4 ± 0.6 mm
mFluoro-Distal Distal Mimicked Fluoroscopy 2.1 ± 1.9 mm 5.2 ± 2.4 mm 3.0 ± 0.9 mm

Literature Kleinbaum and Blankstein [33] Medial Ultrasound 6.7 ± 0.7 mm 9.6 ± 0.7 mm 3.0 ± 0.5 mm
Whelan et al. [25] Medial Fluoroscopy 10.9 ± 2.1 mm
LaPrade et al. [24] Distal Fluoroscopy 5.1 ± 2.1 mm

Also included in the table are data from the literature using similar methods. The location column refers to whether data points were identified at the most medial or most distal aspect of the femur. Some differences between the results from the current study and those in the literature may be due to differences in loading. LaPrade et al. [24] reported that gap width was measured during the application of a 10 Nm load, as in our study, whereas Kleinbaum and Blankstein [33] and Whelan et al. [25] either did not control load or did not report it