Table 1.
Location | Method | Unloaded | Max. Loaded | Change | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current Study | US | Medial | Ultrasound | 8.7 ± 2.4 mm | 10.7 ± 2.2 mm | 2.1 ± 0.7 mm |
mFluoro-Medial | Medial | Mimicked Fluoroscopy | 9.0 ± 2.5 mm | 12.4 ± 2.5 mm | 3.4 ± 0.6 mm | |
mFluoro-Distal | Distal | Mimicked Fluoroscopy | 2.1 ± 1.9 mm | 5.2 ± 2.4 mm | 3.0 ± 0.9 mm | |
| ||||||
Literature | Kleinbaum and Blankstein [33] | Medial | Ultrasound | 6.7 ± 0.7 mm | 9.6 ± 0.7 mm | 3.0 ± 0.5 mm |
Whelan et al. [25] | Medial | Fluoroscopy | – | 10.9 ± 2.1 mm | – | |
LaPrade et al. [24] | Distal | Fluoroscopy | – | 5.1 ± 2.1 mm | – |
Also included in the table are data from the literature using similar methods. The location column refers to whether data points were identified at the most medial or most distal aspect of the femur. Some differences between the results from the current study and those in the literature may be due to differences in loading. LaPrade et al. [24] reported that gap width was measured during the application of a 10 Nm load, as in our study, whereas Kleinbaum and Blankstein [33] and Whelan et al. [25] either did not control load or did not report it