Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 10.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan 3;112(3):415–427. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.529

Table 4. The performance of three models based on gender, clinical manifestations, and endoscopic findings to differentiate intestinal tuberculosis from Crohn's disease.

Cut-point to obtain the best performance of the models
Cut-point (%) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) Accuracy (%)
Model 1 75.12 59.1 100 100 75.0 81.6
Model 2 41.27 90.9 81.5 80.0 91.7 85.7
Model 3 74.52 86.4 88.9 86.4 88.9 87.8
Cut-point to obtain the NPV of 100% for diagnosis of intestinal tuberculosis
Cut-point (%) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) FP FN
Model 1 17.29 100 44.4 59.5 100 15/27 0
Model 2 20.62 100 44.4 59.5 100 15/27 0
Model 3 7.27 100 37.0 56.4 100 17/27 0

FP, false-positive (misdiagnosis of intestinal tuberculosis in patients with Crohn's disease); FN, false-negative (misdiagnosis of Crohn's disease in patient with intestinal tuberculosis); NPV, negative predicted value; PPV, positive predicted value.