Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Behav. 2017 Mar;21(3):905–922. doi: 10.1007/s10461-016-1562-z

Table 4.

Secondary analysis comparing EI to SOC on improvement (from baseline to FU2) for key secondary outcome variables among recently-diagnosed HIV-positive women and men, Cape Town

Dependent variable Group Mean (SD) or N (%)
Baseline FU1 FU2
Intention for consistent condom use SOC 3.61 (0.68) 3.68 (0.68) 3.85 (0.43)
EI 3.31 (0.91) 3.83 (0.43) 3.80 (0.56)
Percentage of condom-protected sex occasions in prior 3 months SOC 0.49 (0.38) 0.82 (0.33) 0.88 (0.29)
EI 0.40 (0.37) 0.91 (0.25) 0.95 (0.14)
Number of condom-unprotected sex occasions in prior 3 months SOC 13.40 (14.33) 3.58 (9.68) 3.21 (10.40)
EI 17.59 (17.74) 1.04 (3.82) 0.77 (2.35)
Self-efficacy for safer sex SOC 3.76 (0.26) 3.71 (0.27) 3.67 (0.25)
EI 3.72 (0.36) 3.79 (0.29) 3.68 (0.34)
Self-efficacy for communicating with partner re: safer sex and SRH SOC 3.71 (0.30) 3.63 (0.34) 3.60 (0.30)
EI 3.68 (0.39) 3.62 (0.35) 3.62 (0.34)
Pill/injectable use in prior 3 months SOC 48 (43.6 %) 40 (45.5 %) 37 (49.3 %)
EI 36 (34.6 %) 45 (48.9 %) 35 (47.3 %)
Used dual-method protection in prior 3 months SOC 42 (38.2 %) 29 (49.2 %) 30 (50.0 %)
EI 27 (26.0 %) 29 (54.7 %) 29 (47.5 %)
Relied on effective contraception during all vaginal sex occasions in prior 3 months SOC 58 (52.7 %) 50 (87.7 %) 48 (85.7 %)
EI 52 (50.0 %) 49 (96.1 %) 49 (92.5 %)
Disclosed HIV status to partner SOC 71 (66.4 %) 40 (67.8 %) 47 (81.0 %)
EI 63 (61.8 %) 39 (76.5 %) 44 (81.5 %)