Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 8;22(5):396–401. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2017.07.005

Table 4.

Planning target volume (PTV) margins reported by different studies.

Study Imaging Correction protocol Margin (range) in mm Largest margin direction
van Kranen et al.10 (2009) CBCT SAL Skull (occiput) 4.6–7 ML
C1–C3 spine 3.8–4.7 ML
C5–C7 spine 5.4–6 AP



Kapanen et al.7 (2013) Orthogonal Weekly Skull (occiput) 6.1(SI), 8.3(AP) AP
kV image C1–C2 spine 4.8–7 AP
C5–C7 spine 4.9–5.7 AP



Djordjevic et al.9 (2014) Orthogonal No Skull (maxilla) 5.2–5.9 SI
kV image C2 spine 4.5(SI), 6.5(AP) AP
C5 spine 5–9.3 AP
Daily Skull (maxilla) 4.2–5.9 AP
C2 spine 2.3(SI),2.6(AP) AP
C5 spine 2.6–5 AP



Cheo et al.8 (2015) CBCT No Skull (clivus) 1.75–2.33 SI
C4 spine 2.61–4.33 ML
C7 spine 2.72–6.52 ML
Weekly Skull (clivus) 0.51–1.2 AP
C4 spine 0.97–3.72 ML
C7 spine 1.2–6.08 ML



Present study Orthogonal No Skull(clivus) 3.2–4.4 AP
kV image C3 spine 4.4–5.5 AP
C6 spine 4.4–6.9 ML

CBCT, cone beam CT; SAL, shrinking action level; AP, antero-posterior; ML, medio-lateral; SI, supero-inferior.