Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 31;13(7):e1006510. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006510

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Escape from CTL responses to epitopes a) Pol SP10 (participant 20225), b) Rev VL9 (participant 20225), c) Env LV9 (participant 40100), d) Gag SM9 (participant 40061), e) putative epitope Nef DQ11 (participant 10463), f) putative epitope in Rev (codons 49–66) (participant 40265), and g) putative epitope in Env (codons 765–782) (participant 40265). In all of these epitopes, evolution of CTL escape happened through epitope shattering. The frequency of each variant and the contribution of main variants to the plasma viral load (gray area) are depicted.