Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 9;7:360. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00360

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Criteria for the selection of candidate tick protective antigens. (A) Annotation and criteria used for the selection of candidate tick protective antigens. The log2 normalized fold change between infected and uninfected tick samples (P < 0.00003) is shown. Bold numbers indicate highly differentially regulated genes (log2 normalized fold change > 5.64) and highly differentially represented proteins (log2 normalized fold change > 3.90) between infected and uninfected tick samples. The selection criteria were (i) highly differentially up-regulated genes in at least two samples, (ii) highly down-regulated genes in at least one sample, (iii) highly differentially over-represented proteins and identified in the I. scapularis proteome, (iv) highly differentially under-represented proteins and identified in the I. scapularis proteome, and/or (v) putative BP in tick-pathogen and tick-host interactions. (B) The GO for BP of selected candidate protective antigens was done with Blast2GO software (version 3.0; http://www.blast2go.com).