Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 15;7(15):5560–5570. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3013

Table 1.

Statistics for the best performing models (ecosystem size (=PC1), biotic community (=PC2), small, steep shore gradient, deep lakes (=PC3), genetic diversity, and charr abundance) and each morphological variable. Following model simplification, ecosystem size remained as the only significant parameter explaining morphology across all tests. Significant p‐values are shown in italics. Asterisks indicate significance levels, with *p < .05, **p < .01, and ***p < .001

Morphology Best model Estimate SE t‐Value p‐Value R 2
MEANHD MEANHD ~ PC1 −0.392 0.169 −2.317 .0297* 0.189
MINHD MINHD ~ PC1 −0.663 0.253 −2.621 .0153* 0.230
MAXHD MAXHD ~ PC1 1.306 0.443 2.949 .0070** 0.274
VARHD VARHD ~ PC1 1.524 0.296 5.156 <.0001*** 0.536