Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 27;19(7):e268. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7115

Table 3.

Results of the three models evaluating primary outcomes among the children at 36 months of age.

Primary outcomes at 36 months Model 1a,b
Model 2c,b
Model 3d,b

Intervention groupe P Intervention groupe P Intervention groupe P
Daily breakfast (yes), ORe (95% CI)f 1.55 (0.74 to 3.25) .25 1.55 (0.72 to 3.34) .25 1.31 (0.56 to 3.10) .52
Activity and outdoor playg, hours/day, beta (95% CI) .04 (−0.02 to 0.10) .18 .04 (−0.05 to 0.13) .38 .05 (−0.04 to 0.15) .29
Sweetened beveragesg, glasses/day, beta (95% CI) −.14 (−0.31 to 0.03) .11 −.14 (−0.31 to 0.03) .11 −.16 (−0.34 to 0.03 .10
Screen timeg, hours/day, beta (95% CI) −.14 (−0.23 to −0.04) .005 −.09 (−0.27 to 0.08) .30 −.07 (−0.25 to 0.12) .47
BMIh, beta (95% CI) .11 (−0.03 to 0.25) .13 .11 (−0.15 to 0.36) .40 .10 (−0.15 to 0.36) .43
BMI-SDSi, beta (95% CI) .11 (0.00 to 0.22) .06 .12 (−0.09 to 0.33) .26 .12 (−0.09 to 0.33) .28
Overweight or obesityj, OR (95% CI) 0.83 (0.48 to 1.46) .52 0.83 (0.46 to 1.49) .52 0.79 (0.44 to 1.43) .43

aModel 1: corrected for the previous assessment of the outcome (where available).

bModels evaluating BMI, BMI-SDS and % overweight or obesity are corrected for birth weight of the child.

cModel 2: corrected for cluster Youth Health Care (YHC) team and the previous assessment of the outcome (where available).

dModel 3: corrected for cluster (YHC team), the previous assessment of the outcome (where available), the child’s ethnic background, and the child’s precise age at follow-up.

eOR: odds ratio.

fThe estimated coefficients and their 95% confidence interval (95% CI) are given for the children in the intervention group relative to the children in the control group.

gThe previous assessment of the outcome (where available) and the outcome at follow-up were log transformed

hBMI: body mass index.

iBMI-SDS: body mass index-standard deviation score.

jPercent overweight or obese is based on the definition reported by Cole et al [7].