Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 16;6(8):437–446. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.153

Table 2. Research Team Meeting Details .

Date Participants Purpose Outcomes
May 19, 2011 3 KU
1 Research agent of KU team
4 R
1 PhDS
1 PC
The approach to be taken to complete the project within a reasonable timeline - Utilize the healthcare organisation’s internal resources to organise the focus groups;
- Recruit the patients through a grouping of community organisations;
- Present the project to network stakeholders in order to sensitize them to the study;
- Study the effectiveness of alternative measures to restraint and seclusion, cost, efficiency; and organizational issues.
June 21, 2011 1 Research agent of KU team
1 PC
1 PhDS
Relevant methods for patient recruitment - Recruit the patient representatives through the community organisations;
- Work directly with the health facilities to identify participants for the focus groups.
July 5, 2011 4 R
1 PhDS
1 PC
Elements to consider in developing the reference framework of patient involvement - The framework may include: Objectives - Who should be involved – For what technology – at which level;
- Adapt the message to decision-makers;
- Link the concepts to concrete examples.
February 24, 2012 1 R
1 Knowledge users
2 Research agent of KU team
1 PC
1 PhDS
Presentation of results of focus groups with patients - Appreciation of work done;
- Conclusions consistent with the study conducted with managers by HTA unit;
- Highlight the critical points for the HTA report.
April 20, 2012 3 R
2 Knowledge users
1 PC
1 PhDS
The drafting of the assessment report in order to integrate the patient perspective - Integrate the methodology of the two studies (Study conducted with managers and study conducted with patients);
- Use the report on the study conducted with managers as guide to ensure that all the document is consistent.

Abbreviations: HTA, health technology assessment; PC, project coordinator; R, researchers; KU, knowledge users; PhDS: PhD students.