Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 10;22:27. doi: 10.1186/s40001-017-0268-7

Table 2.

Intubation characteristics: Cormack and Lehane score, POGO score, and personal review of the participants; POGO, percentage of glottis opening; German school grading system with ratings from 1 (very good) to 6 (very poor)

Cormack and Lehane score POGO score Personal review (German school grading system)
Mean SEM p-value* Mean SEM p-value* mean SEM p-value*
Manikin A
 Direct laryngoscopy 1.2 .1 77.1 3.7 2.2 .1
 Storz cMac 1.1 .1 .493 79.8 4.4 .615 2.2 .2 .803
 Storz dBlade 1.0 .0 .104 91.2 2.3 .000 1.9 .3 .090
 Ambu King Vision 1.0 .0 .104 93.6 2.2 .000 1.9 .2 .137
Manikin B
 Direct laryngoscopy 1.9 .2 40.2 6.3 2.7 .2
 Storz cMac 1.4 .1 .015 59.8 6.9 .012 2.1 .2 .045
 Storz dBlade 1.0 .0 .000 89.1 2.4 .000 1.6 .1 .001
 Ambu King Vision 1.0 .0 .000 94.3 2.2 .000 1.5 .2 .000
Manikin C
 Direct laryngoscopy 2.7 .2 12.8 4.2 4.0 .3
 Storz cMac 1.7 .1 .000 48.2 7.2 .000 2.9 .2 .000
 Storz dBlade 1.1 .0 .000 84.8 2.8 .000 1.6 .2 .000
 Ambu King Vision 1.1 .1 .000 83.4 4.4 .000 2.4 .3 .000

* Level of significance compared to the DL at the same manikin