Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Jan 26;208(4):794–800. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16724

Table 5. Polyp Location, Morphologic Features, and Diagnostic Confidence at Screening CT Colonography.

Variable CRC FH(+)
(N=72 polyps in 156 patients)
CRC FH(-)
(N=2145 polyps in 8857 patients)
Colonic Segment N % N % p-value
 Cecum 7 9.7% 239 11.1% 0.850
 Ascending 18 25.0% 429 20.0% 0.297
 Transverse 14 19.4% 324 15.1% 0.317
 Descending 10 13.9% 178 8.3% 0.126
 Sigmoid 12 16.7% 646 30.1% 0.013
 Rectum 11 15.3% 329 15.3% 0.999
Polyp Morphology N % N % P-value
 Sessile 45 62.5% 1338 62.4% 0.999
 Pedunculated 13 18.1% 346 16.1% 0.627
 Flat* 10 13.9% 379 17.7% 0.528
 Mass – Bulky 2 2.8% 40 1.9% 0.399
 Mass – Carpet* 1 1.4% 20 0.9% 0.147
 Mass – Benign Stricture 1 1.4% 11 0.5% 0.328
 Submucosal/Extrinsic 0 0.0% 11 0.5% 0.999
Diagnostic Confidence N % N % P-value
 3 = most confident 51 70.8% 1678 78.2% 0.462
 2 = somewhat confident 18 25.0% 406 18.9% 0.222
 1 = least confident 3 4.2% 61 2.8% 0.148
*

See Methods for flat lesion definition